0.00/0.04	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.43	% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
0.15/0.43	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.15/0.43	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.15/0.43	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.15/0.43	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.15/0.43	% CPULimit : 1440
0.15/0.43	% WCLimit  : 180
0.15/0.43	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:40:13 UTC 2026
0.15/0.43	% CPUTime  : 
0.15/0.43	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.50	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.26/0.61	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3BGcT2w7b6/E---3.1_720502.p
0.37/0.86	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.37/0.86	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSMNHSA.
0.37/0.86	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_bool_2 with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% new_bool_2 with pid 720522 completed with status 0
0.37/0.86	% Result found by new_bool_2
0.37/0.86	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSMNHSA.
0.37/0.86	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_bool_2 with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.37/0.86	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.37/0.86	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
0.37/0.86	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.37/0.86	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% SubtermCWHack with pid 720523 completed with status 0
0.37/0.86	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.37/0.86	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSMNHSA.
0.37/0.86	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_bool_1 with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Starting new_bool_2 with 180s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
0.37/0.86	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
0.37/0.86	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
0.37/0.86	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.37/0.86	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.37/0.86	% Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
0.37/0.86	
0.37/0.86	% Proof found!
0.37/0.86	% SZS status Theorem
0.37/0.86	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_sort1, type, nat: $tType).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_sort2, type, paraco1605129243lle_tv: $tType).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_sort3, type, set_Pa1764573435lle_tv: $tType).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_26, type, inj_on772319074lle_tv: (paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv) > set_Pa1764573435lle_tv > $o).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_78, type, top_to1057771083lle_tv: set_Pa1764573435lle_tv).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_83, type, paraco1147068288nge_tv: (nat > nat) > paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_141, type, f: nat > nat).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_142, type, esk1_1: (paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv) > paraco1605129243lle_tv).
0.37/0.86	thf(decl_143, type, esk2_1: (paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv) > paraco1605129243lle_tv).
0.37/0.86	thf(fact_25_injI, axiom, ![X245:paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv]:(((inj_on772319074lle_tv @ X245 @ top_to1057771083lle_tv)<=![X12:paraco1605129243lle_tv, X246:paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((X245 @ X12)=(X245 @ X246))=>((X12)=(X246)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3BGcT2w7b6/E---3.1_720502.p', fact_25_injI)).
0.37/0.86	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (inj_on772319074lle_tv @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f) @ top_to1057771083lle_tv), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3BGcT2w7b6/E---3.1_720502.p', conj_0)).
0.37/0.86	thf(fact_0__092_060open_062_092_060And_062tv2_Atv1_O_Achange__tv_Af_Atv1_A_061_Achange__tv_Af_Atv2_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Atv1_A_061_Atv2_092_060close_062, axiom, ![X553:paraco1605129243lle_tv, X554:paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X553)=(paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X554))=>((X553)=(X554)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.3BGcT2w7b6/E---3.1_720502.p', fact_0__092_060open_062_092_060And_062tv2_Atv1_O_Achange__tv_Af_Atv1_A_061_Achange__tv_Af_Atv2_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Atv1_A_061_Atv2_092_060close_062)).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X245:paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((![X12:paraco1605129243lle_tv, X246:paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((X245 @ X12)=(X245 @ X246))=>((X12)=(X246))))=>(inj_on772319074lle_tv @ X245 @ top_to1057771083lle_tv))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_25_injI])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~((inj_on772319074lle_tv @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f) @ top_to1057771083lle_tv)), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1308:paraco1605129243lle_tv, X1309:paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X1308)!=(paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X1309))|((X1308)=(X1309)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_0__092_060open_062_092_060And_062tv2_Atv1_O_Achange__tv_Af_Atv1_A_061_Achange__tv_Af_Atv2_A_092_060Longrightarrow_062_Atv1_A_061_Atv2_092_060close_062])])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X1245:paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv]:(((((X1245 @ (esk1_1 @ X1245))=(X1245 @ (esk2_1 @ X1245)))|(inj_on772319074lle_tv @ X1245 @ top_to1057771083lle_tv))&(((esk1_1 @ X1245)!=(esk2_1 @ X1245))|(inj_on772319074lle_tv @ X1245 @ top_to1057771083lle_tv)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~(inj_on772319074lle_tv @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f) @ top_to1057771083lle_tv), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X12:paraco1605129243lle_tv, X76:paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((X12)=(X76))|((paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X12)!=(paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X76)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X10:paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((X10 @ (esk1_1 @ X10))=(X10 @ (esk2_1 @ X10)))|(inj_on772319074lle_tv @ X10 @ top_to1057771083lle_tv))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~((inj_on772319074lle_tv @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f) @ top_to1057771083lle_tv)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X12:paraco1605129243lle_tv]:((((X12)=(esk1_1 @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f)))|((paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ X12)!=(paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f @ (esk2_1 @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f)))))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X10:paraco1605129243lle_tv > paraco1605129243lle_tv]:(((inj_on772319074lle_tv @ X10 @ top_to1057771083lle_tv)|((esk1_1 @ X10)!=(esk2_1 @ X10)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_13, plain, ((esk1_1 @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f))=(esk2_1 @ (paraco1147068288nge_tv @ f))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.37/0.86	thf(c_0_14, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_10]), ['proof']).
0.37/0.86	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.37/0.86	% Parsed axioms                        : 489
0.37/0.86	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 383
0.37/0.86	% Initial clauses                      : 192
0.37/0.86	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
0.37/0.86	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 183
0.37/0.86	% Processed clauses                    : 705
0.37/0.86	% ...of these trivial                  : 9
0.37/0.86	% ...subsumed                          : 317
0.37/0.86	% ...remaining for further processing  : 379
0.37/0.86	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 71
0.37/0.86	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.37/0.86	% Backward-subsumed                    : 18
0.37/0.86	% Backward-rewritten                   : 8
0.37/0.86	% Generated clauses                    : 3742
0.37/0.86	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3007
0.37/0.86	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.37/0.86	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.37/0.86	% Paramodulations                      : 3632
0.37/0.86	% Factorizations                       : 8
0.37/0.86	% NegExts                              : 0
0.37/0.86	% Equation resolutions                 : 84
0.37/0.86	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.37/0.86	% Total rewrite steps                  : 1012
0.37/0.86	% ...of those cached                   : 836
0.37/0.86	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.37/0.86	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.37/0.86	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.37/0.86	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.37/0.86	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.37/0.86	% Current number of processed clauses  : 325
0.37/0.86	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
0.37/0.86	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.37/0.86	%    Negative unit clauses             : 3
0.37/0.86	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 301
0.37/0.86	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2443
0.37/0.86	% ...number of literals in the above   : 8622
0.37/0.86	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.37/0.86	% Current number of archived clauses   : 30
0.37/0.86	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13189
0.37/0.86	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10751
0.37/0.86	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 319
0.37/0.86	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 290
0.37/0.86	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.37/0.86	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 21
0.37/0.86	% BW rewrite match successes           : 8
0.37/0.86	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.37/0.86	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.37/0.86	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 72906
0.37/0.86	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 7688
0.37/0.86	
0.37/0.86	% -------------------------------------------------
0.37/0.86	% User time                : 0.174 s
0.37/0.86	% System time              : 0.019 s
0.37/0.86	% Total time               : 0.193 s
0.37/0.86	% Maximum resident set size: 5596 pages
0.37/0.86	
0.37/0.86	% -------------------------------------------------
0.37/0.86	% User time                : 0.205 s
0.37/0.86	% System time              : 0.026 s
0.37/0.86	% Total time               : 0.231 s
0.37/0.86	% Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
0.37/0.86	% E exiting
0.37/0.87	EOF